facebook

When is PRESBYOND better than lens replacement?

< 1 min read

PRESBYOND is often better than lens replacement for younger presbyopes with clear lenses who wish to avoid intraocular surgery.

Scenarios favouring PRESBYOND

Preserving the natural lens is advantageous.

  • Age roughly 40-55 with minimal lens opacity
  • Good natural contrast and accommodation for intermediate tasks
  • Suitability for corneal laser and blended‑vision optics
  • Low tolerance for intraocular risks such as infection or retinal detachment
  • Desire to defer lens surgery until cataracts truly justify it

When lens replacement is preferable

Lens changes or goals point to IOLs.

  • Early cataract or lens‑related glare already affecting vision
  • Age typically over 55-60 where cataract is likely in the nearer term
  • Wish for a once‑off procedure addressing both presbyopia and lens ageing
  • Corneal contraindications to laser, such as thin or irregular corneas
  • Suitability for multifocal or EDOF lenses with acceptable risk profile