facebook

In Your 40s, Is ICL or Lens Replacement More Stable Over the Long Term?

2 min read

In patients in their 40s, choosing between ICL surgery and refractive lens replacement becomes less about immediate clarity and more about long-term visual planning. ICL preserves the natural lens and residual accommodation, which can be valuable during early presbyopia. However, the lens continues to age, and cataract surgery is likely at some point. ¹

Lens replacement removes the ageing lens entirely, eliminating future cataract risk and providing long-term refractive stability. The trade-off is loss of natural accommodation, which must be addressed using multifocal, extended-depth-of-focus, or monofocal strategies. ²

There is no universally correct option. Patients with high myopia, early lens changes, or a preference to avoid multiple future procedures may lean towards lens replacement. Others may prioritise preserving their natural optics for as long as possible.

The key is planning vision over 10–20 years rather than focusing solely on short-term outcomes. ¹ ²

References

  1. Packer M. Meta-analysis and review of the effectiveness and safety of the implantable collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059–1077.
  2. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042.

Related Topics

About Blue Fin Vision®

Blue Fin Vision® is a GMC-registered, consultant-led ophthalmology clinic with CQC-regulated facilities across London, Hertfordshire, and Essex. Patient outcomes are independently audited by the National Ophthalmology Database, confirming exceptionally low complication rates.