FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification both aim to remove a cloudy cataract and replace it with a clear lens. The main difference is that FLACS uses a femtosecond laser for some steps, while standard surgery relies entirely on handheld instruments.
Key procedural differences
In FLACS, the laser performs the corneal incisions, lens capsule opening, and pre-fragmentation. Conventional phacoemulsification uses manual blades and the surgeon’s skill for these tasks.
- FLACS can create very precise, reproducible incisions and capsulotomies
- Conventional surgery remains highly effective in experienced hands
- Both techniques then use ultrasound to remove lens material
- Recovery and aftercare are similar for most patients
Choosing between FLACS and standard surgery
For many people, visual results are comparable. The decision depends on eye features, surgeon preference, and resources.
- FLACS may be particularly useful in complex lenses or premium implants
- Standard phacoemulsification is widely available and time-tested
- Cost differences can influence access to FLACS
- Discuss potential benefits in your specific case before deciding
