---
title: FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification
description: "FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification both aim to remove a cloudy cataract and replace it with a clear lens. The main difference is that FLACS uses a femtosecond laser for some steps, while standard surgery relies entirely on handheld instruments. ##…"
url: "https://bluefinvision.com/knowledge-base/topics/treatments-procedures/flacs-vs-conventional-phacoemulsification/"
updated: "2025-12-16"
category: "Treatments & Procedures"
---

# FLACS vs conventional phacoemulsification

FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification both aim to remove a cloudy cataract and replace it with a clear lens. The main difference is that FLACS uses a femtosecond laser for some steps, while standard surgery relies entirely on handheld instruments.

## Key procedural differences

In FLACS, the laser performs the corneal incisions, lens capsule opening, and pre-fragmentation. Conventional phacoemulsification uses manual blades and the surgeon's skill for these tasks.

- FLACS can create very precise, reproducible incisions and capsulotomies
- Conventional surgery remains highly effective in experienced hands
- Both techniques then use ultrasound to remove lens material
- Recovery and aftercare are similar for most patients

## Choosing between FLACS and standard surgery

For many people, visual results are comparable. The decision depends on eye features, surgeon preference, and resources.

- FLACS may be particularly useful in complex lenses or premium implants
- Standard phacoemulsification is widely available and time-tested
- Cost differences can influence access to FLACS
- Discuss potential benefits in your specific case before deciding